Javanese Limasan Architecture and 3D Modeling for the Revitalization of the Rumah Sandi Dukuh Heritage Site

Authors

  • Avril Ailsa Suha Maharani Institut Seni Indonesia Yogyakarta, Indonesia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.33292/locus.v3i01.24

Keywords:

3D modeling, cultural heritage revitalization, Javanese limasan architecture, museum curatorship, Rumah Sandi Dukuh

Abstract

Rumah Sandi Dukuh is a Javanese limasan house in Kulon Progo, Yogyakarta, that served as an emergency post of the Dinas Code, Indonesia's wartime cryptography service, during the Second Dutch Military Aggression, and is now managed by Museum Sandi as an object presumed to be cultural heritage. Its revitalization programme had not been preceded by a systematic architectural study, leaving the building's historical form undocumented ahead of physical intervention. This study documents the identity, dimensions, and architectural style of Rumah Sandi Dukuh and produces a three-dimensional model as a technical reference for its revitalization. A qualitative case study carried out between September and December 2024 combined field observation and architectural measurement at the site, in-depth interviews with the museum officer responsible for the site and with a son of the original owner, and a literature study on heritage revitalization and Javanese vernacular architecture. Building-identity data were compiled on a Cultural Heritage Building Identity Sheet, and findings were triangulated across measurement and testimony before being modeled digitally. Rumah Sandi Dukuh, built before 1948, is found to be a limasan apitan pengapit, formed from two limasan lawakan units joined at the emper with a talang air, with a building area of 117 m² on a plot of 1,190 m². The resulting model, covering the building's ground floor, has been used by the Badan Siber dan Sandi Negara since November 2024 to guide the site's revitalization. The case shows how a small heritage institution can operationalize the documentation-before-designation principle of international conservation doctrine largely through manual methods.

References

Australia ICOMOS. (2013). The Burra Charter: The Australia ICOMOS charter for places of cultural significance. Australia ICOMOS.

Azizah, N., Kurniady, T., Hantono, G., Martunus, R. W., Dikaputera, R., & Winandari, M. I. R. (2024). Panduan ilustratif regulasi bangunan & kawasan Jakarta: Kawasan dan bangunan cagar budaya (1st ed.). Ikatan Arsitek Indonesia Jakarta.

Badan Siber dan Sandi Negara. (2023). Profil Museum Sandi. https://www.bssn.go.id/profil-museum-sandi/

Creswell, J. W., & Poth, C. N. (2018). Qualitative inquiry and research design: Choosing among five approaches (4th ed.). SAGE Publications.

Falk, J. H., & Dierking, L. D. (2013). The museum experience revisited. Left Coast Press.

Feilden, B. M. (2003). Conservation of historic buildings (3rd ed.). Architectural Press.

Gray, C., & McCall, V. (2020). The role of today’s museum. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780429293566

ICOMOS. (1964). International charter for the conservation and restoration of monuments and sites (the Venice Charter). International Council on Monuments and Sites.

Idham, N. C. (2018). Javanese vernacular architecture and environmental synchronization based on the regional diversity of Joglo and Limasan. Frontiers of Architectural Research, 7(3), 317–333. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foar.2018.06.006

Maryam, M., & Puspitasari, A. (2021). Pengembangan bahan ajar berbasis museum pada mata kuliah museologi. Rumah Literasi Publishing.

Miles, M. B., Huberman, A. M., & Saldaña, J. (2014). Qualitative data analysis: A methods sourcebook (3rd ed.). SAGE Publications.

Murphy, M., McGovern, E., & Pavia, S. (2009). Historic building information modeling (HBIM). Structural Survey, 27(4), 311–327. https://doi.org/10.1108/02630800910985108

Novriyadi. (2023, October 25). Mengenal rumah limasan Jawa, filosofi & jenisnya. Lamudi. https://www.lamudi.co.id/journal/rumah-limasan-jawa/

Prasetyo, Y. (2018). State-of-art konservasi bangunan dan cagar budaya melalui pembentukan model 3 dimensi berbasis teknik fotogrametri rentang dekat. Elipsoida: Jurnal Geodesi dan Geomatika, 1(2), 61–68. https://doi.org/10.14710/elipsoida.2018.3698

Prihatmaji, Y. P., Kitamori, A., & Komatsu, K. (2014). Traditional Javanese wooden houses (Joglo) damaged by May 2006 Yogyakarta earthquake, Indonesia. International Journal of Architectural Heritage, 8(2), 247–268. https://doi.org/10.1080/15583058.2012.692847

Prijotomo, J. (1995). Petungan: Sistem ukuran dalam arsitektur Jawa. Gadjah Mada University Press.

Republik Indonesia. (2010). Undang-Undang Nomor 11 Tahun 2010 tentang Cagar Budaya. Lembaran Negara Republik Indonesia Tahun 2010 Nomor 130.

Rohman, A. (2017). Dasar-dasar manajemen. Inteligensia Media.

Rukayah, R. S. (2020). Konservasi dan revitalisasi. Lembaga Pengembangan dan Penjaminan Mutu Pendidikan, Universitas Diponegoro.

Tohar, I., Hardiman, G., Ratih Sari, S., & Punto Hendro, E. (2019). Traces of transcendental space as components to preserve Yogyakarta Palace’s meaning. International Journal of Civil Engineering and Technology, 10(3), 1198–1206.

Ulvi, A. (2021). Documentation, three-dimensional (3D) modeling and visualization of cultural heritage by using unmanned aerial vehicle (UAV) photogrammetry and terrestrial laser scanners. International Journal of Remote Sensing, 42(6), 1994–2021. https://doi.org/10.1080/01431161.2020.1834164

Wibowo, H. J., Murniatmo, G., & Sukirman, D. (1998). Arsitektur tradisional Daerah Istimewa Yogyakarta (2nd ed.). CV Pialamas Permai.

Widianto, H. (2013a). Pedoman pemanfaatan cagar budaya nasional dan dunia. Direktorat Jenderal Kebudayaan, Kementerian Pendidikan dan Kebudayaan.

Widianto, H. (2013b). Pedoman revitalisasi cagar budaya. Direktorat Jenderal Kebudayaan, Kementerian Pendidikan dan Kebudayaan.

Yin, R. K. (2018). Case study research and applications: Design and methods (6th ed.). SAGE Publications.

Downloads

Published

2025-06-01

Issue

Section

Articles

Citation Check