Shot as an Instrument of Visual Characterization in the Religious Biopic Muhammad: The Messenger of God
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.33292/locus.v3i02.27Keywords:
camera angle, Majid Majidi, narrative coherence, shot size, visual representationAbstract
Religious biopics that withhold the face of their central figure place an unusual burden on cinematography, since the character must be constructed from everything except the face. Scholarship on shot and characterization has grown quickly, yet it has been drawn almost entirely from films whose protagonists can be shown in close-up, leaving the face-avoidant case unexamined. This article examines how shot functions as an instrument of visual characterization in the 2015 film directed by Majid Majidi, and evaluates how effectively it does so. The study is a qualitative textual analysis of a single-film corpus that combines the four shot elements of angle nature, level angle, shot size, and camera movement with a three-dimensional model of character and a criterion of narrative coherence. Shots bearing directly on the protagonist were sampled purposively from the full runtime and grouped into the three age ranges the film depicts: infancy, childhood, and pre-adolescence. Each shot was coded for its four elements, interpreted for its characterization meaning, and assessed against the narrative context of the scene in which it appears. Objective angle, high level angle, medium shot size, and follow movement form the dominant combination. Effectiveness is nevertheless uneven: repeated high angle flattens psychological characterization and in places contradicts the protagonist’s social standing, one subjective-angle scene distorts his physical proportion, and a tilt-up misreads the emotional weight of the scene it closes. The article contributes an evaluative, rather than descriptive, framework for analysing cinematography produced under representational constraint.
References
Baranowski, A. M., & Hecht, H. (2018). Effect of camera angle on perception of trust and attractiveness. Empirical Studies of the Arts, 36(1), 90–100. https://doi.org/10.1177/0276237417710762
Bingham, D. (2010). Whose lives are they anyway? The biopic as contemporary film genre. Rutgers University Press.
Bordwell, D., & Thompson, K. (2019). Film art: An introduction (12th ed.). McGraw-Hill.
Custen, G. F. (1992). Bio/pics: How Hollywood constructed public history. Rutgers University Press.
Egri, L. (1946). The art of dramatic writing: Its basis in the creative interpretation of human motives. Simon & Schuster.
Ghufron, A. Z., Widadi, & Zuhriyah, L. F. (2025). A comparative study of the religious films Sang Pencerah and Sang Kiai from the perspective of religious moderation. Indonesian Journal of Islamic Communication, 8(1), 1–14.
Gruber, C. (2009). Between logos (kalima) and light (nur): Representations of the Prophet Muhammad in Islamic painting. Muqarnas, 26, 1–34. https://doi.org/10.1163/22118993-90000141
Hall, E. T. (1966). The hidden dimension. Doubleday.
Kraft, R. N. (1987). The influence of camera angle on comprehension and retention of pictorial events. Memory & Cognition, 15(4), 291–307. https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03197033
Majidi, M. (Director). (2015). Muhammad: The Messenger of God [Film]. Nour-e Taban Film Production; Infinite Production.
Mascelli, J. V. (1965). The five C’s of cinematography: Motion picture filming techniques. Cine/Grafic Publications.
McCain, T. A., Chilberg, J., & Wakshlag, J. (1977). The effect of camera angle on source credibility and attraction. Journal of Broadcasting, 21(1), 35–46. https://doi.org/10.1080/08838157709363814
McKee, R. (1997). Story: Substance, structure, style and the principles of screenwriting. ReganBooks.
Monaco, J. (2009). How to read a film: Movies, media, and beyond (4th ed.). Oxford University Press.
Naficy, H. (2012). A social history of Iranian cinema: Vol. 4. The globalizing era, 1984–2010. Duke University Press.
Negara, G. A., Eriswan, & Pradhono, C. (2023). Camera angle untuk memperlihatkan karakter protagonis, antagonis dan tritagonis pada film Kaliya. CINELOOK: Journal of Film, Television and New Media, 1(1), 48–57.
Nuramalina. (2021). Teknik pengambilan gambar dalam produksi feature berita televisi. Jurnal Visi Komunikasi, 20(2), 213–230.
Nurmansyah, M. A. (2023). Problematizing contemporary Islamic discourse: A conceptual modeling of new heroes in Indonesian Islamic biographical films. Buletin Al-Turas, 29(1), 81–92.
Pak-Shiraz, N. (2025). Representing Muhammad: The Prophet on screen. Material Religion, 21(1), 74–106.
Pratista, H. (2017). Memahami film (2nd ed.). Montase Press.
Sanjaya, W., & Marian, H. (2023). Relasi kepercayaan diri pada karakter utama dengan penempatan kamera dalam film Tár. Jurnal Seni Nasional Cikini, 9(2), 121–132.
Sanz-Aznar, J., Bruni, L. E., & Soto-Faraco, S. (2023). Cinematographic continuity edits across shot scales and camera angles: An ERP analysis. Frontiers in Neuroscience, 17, Article 1173704. https://doi.org/10.3389/fnins.2023.1173704
Sugiyono. (2019). Metode penelitian kuantitatif, kualitatif, dan R&D. Alfabeta.
Tiemens, R. K. (1970). Some relationships of camera angle to communicator credibility. Journal of Broadcasting, 14(4), 483–490. https://doi.org/10.1080/08838157009363614
Widiyatmika, W., Sulistyo, E. T., & Nugroho, S. (2019). Nilai pendidikan karakter pada film Sang Kiai. Mudra: Jurnal Seni Budaya, 34(1), 77–84.
Zettl, H. (2017). Sight, sound, motion: Applied media aesthetics (8th ed.). Cengage Learning.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
Citation Check
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Journal of Local Culture Study

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.








