Masculinity Under the Mask: An Experimental Film on Gender in Topèng Dhâlâng Sumenep

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.33292/locus.v4i01.33

Keywords:

corporeal competence, cross-gender performance, Madura, practice as research, visual ethnography

Abstract

Topèng Dhâlâng is a Madurese masked dance-drama, still living in Sumenep Regency, in which every role, including all female characters, is performed by men while the dalang alone voices the dialogue. Existing scholarship on the form has concentrated on documentation, iconography and function, and has left the gendered labour of the performing body largely unexamined. This article reports a practice-as-research project that translated that phenomenon into TOPONG, an experimental film. The study asks how Madurese male bodies produce a convincing femininity onstage within a culture widely identified with an assertive ideal of manhood, and how that lived experience can be rendered as cinema rather than merely documented as spectacle. Fieldwork was carried out in Dusun Semaan, Dasuk District, Sumenep, through visual ethnography: participant observation of rehearsals, backstage preparation and performances, in-depth interviews with the dalang, dancers, musicians and mask keeper, audiovisual recording, and a reflexive journal. The material was interpreted through Judith Butler's account of gender as performative, and was then translated through a seven-stage creation model running from visual ethnography to artistic reflection. The study finds that the femininity of Topèng Dhâlâng is not disguise but a learned corporeal competence transmitted through repetition, one that coexists with rather than replaces the performers' masculinity; that the mask operates as a threshold rather than a covering, altering how the body senses as well as how it is seen; and that the acts of putting on and removing the mask carry as much meaning as the staged performance. TOPONG demonstrates that experimental film grounded in ethnographic experience produces knowledge about tradition that descriptive documentation cannot reach.

References

Barbash, I., & Taylor, L. (1997). Cross-cultural filmmaking: A handbook for making documentary and ethnographic films and videos. University of California Press.

Bouvier, H. (2002). Lèbur! Seni musik dan pertunjukan dalam masyarakat Madura (R. S. Hidayat & J. Couteau, Trans.). Forum Jakarta-Paris, École Française d'Extrême-Orient, & Yayasan Obor Indonesia.

Butler, J. (1988). Performative acts and gender constitution: An essay in phenomenology and feminist theory. Theatre Journal, 40(4), 519–531. https://doi.org/10.2307/3207893

Butler, J. (1990). Gender trouble: Feminism and the subversion of identity. Routledge.

Butler, J. (1993). Bodies that matter: On the discursive limits of “sex”. Routledge.

Connell, R. W. (2005). Masculinities (2nd ed.). University of California Press.

Connell, R. W., & Messerschmidt, J. W. (2005). Hegemonic masculinity: Rethinking the concept. Gender & Society, 19(6), 829–859. https://doi.org/10.1177/0891243205278639

Emigh, J. (1996). Masked performance: The play of self and other in ritual and theatre. University of Pennsylvania Press.

Foley, K. (2017). The woman thing: Issues and advances for women in Sundanese performance. In A. Madhavan (Ed.), Women in Asian performance: Aesthetics and politics (pp. 15–27). Routledge.

Grimshaw, A., & Ravetz, A. (2009). Observational cinema: Anthropology, film, and the exploration of social life. Indiana University Press.

Hughes-Freeland, F. (2008). Embodied communities: Dance traditions and change in Java. Berghahn Books.

MacDougall, D. (2006). The corporeal image: Film, ethnography, and the senses. Princeton University Press.

Nelson, R. (2013). Practice as research in the arts: Principles, protocols, pedagogies, resistances. Palgrave Macmillan.

Nichols, B. (2017). Introduction to documentary (3rd ed.). Indiana University Press.

Peacock, J. L. (1987). Rites of modernization: Symbolic and social aspects of Indonesian proletarian drama. University of Chicago Press.

Pink, S. (2021). Doing visual ethnography (4th ed.). SAGE Publications.

Rahayu, E. W., Handayaningrum, W., Sasanadjati, J. D., & Sudrajat, A. (2021). Offering dance in the performance of topèng dhâlâng Madura as a creative industry commodity. In Proceedings of the International Joint Conference on Arts and Humanities 2021 (IJCAH 2021) (pp. 148–152). Atlantis Press. https://doi.org/10.2991/assehr.k.211223.027

Rifai, M. A. (2007). Manusia Madura: Pembawaan, perilaku, etos kerja, penampilan, dan pandangan hidupnya seperti dicitrakan peribahasanya. Pilar Media.

Ross, L. M., & Nini Thowok, D. (2005). Mask, gender, and performance in Indonesia: An interview with Didik Nini Thowok. Asian Theatre Journal, 22(2), 214–226. https://doi.org/10.1353/atj.2005.0033

Russell, C. (1999). Experimental ethnography: The work of film in the age of video. Duke University Press.

Schechner, R. (2013). Performance studies: An introduction (3rd ed.). Routledge.

Smith, H., & Dean, R. T. (Eds.). (2009). Practice-led research, research-led practice in the creative arts. Edinburgh University Press.

Sunardi, C. (2009). Pushing at the boundaries of the body: Cultural politics and cross-gender dance in East Java. Bijdragen tot de Taal-, Land- en Volkenkunde, 165(4), 459–492. https://doi.org/10.1163/22134379-90003629

Sunardi, C. (2015). Stunning males and powerful females: Gender and tradition in East Javanese dance. University of Illinois Press.

Turner, V. (1982). From ritual to theatre: The human seriousness of play. PAJ Publications.

Wiyata, A. L. (2002). Carok: Konflik kekerasan dan harga diri orang Madura. LKiS.

Downloads

Published

2026-06-01

Issue

Section

Articles

Citation Check